“Lenders like the security of a person living in a home because it’s the best possible security,” explains Butler. “Lenders are confident that if someone is living in the home full-time, then there is a really good chance that they’ll want to keep a roof over their head, and that means they’ll make their mortgage payments. It’s why ‘owner-occupied’ is often part of the mortgage contract.”
In fact, mortgage lenders aren’t fazed at all if you rent out a portion of your home to make extra money—and they don’t care if you make this money through a leased tenant, via short-term rentals or by boarding a foreign-exchange student.
“As long as you keep living there, the bank has no interest in what you do,” says Butler. (However, insurance companies do care if you use your home to earn extra cash, so you’ll need to keep them informed. For details, read here.)
What if you don’t live in the property you rent out?
Let’s say you move out of your principal residence, but continue to use it for short-term rentals while you continue to pay down the mortgage. Technically, you need to notify your lender—and, currently, no bank or residential mortgage lender in Canada will offer a mortgage on a property used solely for short-term rentals. So you would need to apply for a commercial mortgage, which is significantly more expensive (more on that below).
However, there’s no active enforcement of this…yet.
“Airbnb and the short-term rental phenomenon is fairly new [in Canada],” says Butler. He estimates that the short-term rental market only began to radically expand in the last 18 to 24 months. There hasn’t been enough time for lenders to implement any meaningful policies regarding the use of a property for short-term rentals—but that doesn’t mean policy changes aren’t coming.
“Unless a property is sold, all mortgages renew,” explains Butler. In other words, for now, the mortgage on your Airbnb property is likely safe as long as you continue to own it. However, Butler says, “some lenders may choose to start implementing a review of properties upon renewal. A simple search can show whether or not a property has been rented out on a short-term basis, [and] as soon as a lender finds that your property is being used as a short-term rental, they can choose not to renew your mortgage.”
At this point, the owner has two choices:
The same situation for the same reasons exists in the US. Lenders will become less nervous with experience of success on the part of landlords of short-term rentals, but more importantly they’re going to see that short-term rentals allowed by home owner associations and government has a profound effect on the value of the property. One thing missing in the article is the relatively greater appreciation of the property value of short-term compared to long-term rentals. Bankers, especially when there is plenty of business in the owner occupied market, tend to be pretty ham fisted when some new scenario comes along. Financing long-term rentals will continue because of banker familiarity with the business plan. Something will eventually catch their eye and bankers will realize they are missing something in the equation, and it is missing in this article. A specific, but common condition needs to exist in statute, the grandfathering of rules in place at the time of purchase which usually happens because politicians don’t like to be depleting property values enacting new rules, but will happily do so if all it does is suppress the future. Then, you have to wait but not for very long. Government and associations are actively and in rapid pace restricting short-term rentals. If you’ve got one, you’re sitting on dwindling supply. What the lenders are currently missing is valuation increase in excess of inflation of the asset value securing the loan. You need to have a vehicle to transfer ownership without triggering the loss of grandfathering. It is pretty simple in Florida, but I confess I have no idea about Canada.