What is a pension bridge benefit and how does it work?
With retirement a couple years away, Kevin is considering his options. Forgoing the bridge benefit may help him enjoy his pension payments for longer.
Advertisement
With retirement a couple years away, Kevin is considering his options. Forgoing the bridge benefit may help him enjoy his pension payments for longer.
Q. I am 57 years old and plan to retire at 59 with an unreduced pension. There are several options for me to choose from in selecting my pension, but one feature I am not sure about is the option to receive a bridge payment that will top up my pension until age 65. Once I turn 65, this bridge payment will disappear and my actual pension will also be reduced by a pre-calculated amount that will be offset by the inclusion of the CPP payments that I will start collecting at that time.
I have not run the numbers, but a ballpark calculation shows that for the benefit of receiving the bridge payment for six years, from age 59 to 65, I will be receiving a lower pension after age 65. It appears that if I live into my 70s or longer, I will actually receive less money than if I had not taken the bridge payment.
My question is: Why would someone select a bridge payment on their pension unless they were likely to have a shortened life expectancy? Wouldn’t a better strategy be to not take the bridge payment and instead supplement the pension income from age 59 to 65 from other sources of income, such as RRSPs, TFSAs, investment income or part-time work?
–Kevin
A. Most defined benefit (DB) pension plan members will need to make a choice when they retire and before they start their pension. The options presented may be limited or extensive, depending on the pension plan, and they often include choosing a survivor benefit of varying percentages of your pension that will be payable to your spouse upon your death.
Bridge benefits are sometimes predetermined and sometimes optional. In your case, it sounds like you can choose to receive a higher pension before age 65 and a lower pension after age 65. The higher benefit before age 65 is called a bridge benefit because it notionally bridges your pension income until the date that other pensions—like the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Old Age Security (OAS) typically start.
Receiving a higher DB pension until age 65 and a lower one after age 65 is often mitigated by the fact that your CPP and OAS benefits more or less cover the decrease (usually more). Contrary to popular belief, the actual timing of your CPP and OAS will not impact your DB pension payments. You can start your CPP as early as 60 or as late as 70. OAS can start at 65 or be delayed up until age 70. The earlier you start any pension, the lower the payments because you will receive those payments for more years.
You have noted that by forgoing the bridge benefit, and not receiving more DB pension income before age 65, you will receive more cumulative payments by your 70s, Kevin. And that means if you live into your 80s and 90s, you will receive that much more lifetime pension income by forgoing the bridge benefit.
Calculations like this are tricky to do on the back of a napkin because there are also benefits to receiving more income early. You will not need to withdraw as much of your savings from other sources to fund your retirement. Or you may be able to maximize your Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA). Or you may be able to pay down any lingering debt. You see, there is a time value of money such that a dollar today is better than a dollar tomorrow.
Regardless, I suspect that if you live into your late 70s or early 80s, Kevin, you may be better off forgoing the bridge benefit and getting more pension income later. The word “suspect” has an asterisk, as without knowing the pension plan you are in or crunching the numbers, I am simply speculating. Pensions—including the CPP and OAS—are often structured such that those with longer life expectancies than average may be better off deferring the start of their pensions.
Longevity is one important factor when making a pension decision, but there are others. The lower your investment risk tolerance, the better off you are deferring your pension income as well. The idea is if you have low-yielding investments, preserving those investments by starting your pensions early or choosing a bridge benefit will not pay off as much as someone who has a high risk tolerance and whose investments may be expected to earn better returns.
Your spouse, if you have one, is another factor to consider. Pensions that have survivor benefits—like DB pensions and, in some cases, the CPP— may have a safety net in place if you defer your pension and die young. At least if you have a spouse who can receive a survivor benefit, deferring the pension was not all for naught because they will continue to receive some or all of the pension for their lifetime.
If you are going to continue to work part-time, Kevin, forgoing the bridge benefit may be a good idea. The bridge benefit will just increase your income between now and age 65, and push you into a higher tax bracket along with your employment earnings.
Deferring pensions—whether bridge benefits, DB pensions, CPP or OAS—may also allow you to draw down your Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP*) or other registered accounts early. In some cases, early registered withdrawals combined with pension deferral can be a good strategy.
There are different factors to consider when you make a pension decision. Despite the relative ease compared to planning for workers without pensions, even DB pensioners have important retirement planning decisions to consider.
Jason Heath is a fee-only, advice-only Certified Financial Planner (CFP) at Objective Financial Partners Inc. in Toronto. He does not sell any financial products whatsoever.
Compare the Best RRSP Savings Accounts in Canada* >
Affiliate (monetized) links can sometimes result in a payment to MoneySense (owned by Ratehub Inc.), which helps our website stay free to our users. If a link has an asterisk (*) or is labelled as “Featured,” it is an affiliate link. If a link is labelled as “Sponsored,” it is a paid placement, which may or may not have an affiliate link. Our editorial content will never be influenced by these links. We are committed to looking at all available products in the market. Where a product ranks in our article, and whether or not it’s included in the first place, is never driven by compensation. For more details, read our MoneySense Monetization policy.
Share this article Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Share on Reddit Share on Email
Hello Jason. Please comment on my situation. I worked for the City of Brandon in Manitoba from 1974 until 1988. In 2001 as the result of a divorce, I decided to apply for a bridging pension to assist me due to me taking training for a nurse and having
low income. I was age 43 in 1988 when I quit working and 56 in 2001 when I applied for the pension. At the time of application, it was not explained to me that at age 65 my pension would be reduced drastically when the government funding stopped. Obviously this was a terrible mistake on my part. I received my pension for 10 years at nearly $800 monthly until 2011 and it was then reduced to approximately $165 monthly. I am now age 76. What happened to the remaining pension that I would have received for the rest of my life had I not applied and received the bridging pension? If I live possibly another 20 years (including the past 10 when I received only $165. monthly), what has happened to the rest of my pension that I would have received at $800. monthly for my lifetime? My Federal government pension dollars supplemented my bridged pension not the Manitoba Employees Benefits Plan. It seems to me that they owe me my pension for the remainder of my life now that the supplemented amount is not being paid by the government. Please help me understand what has happened. It is only now that I have come to realize I have been robbed of my pension. I should have recognized this long ago!
Due to the large volume of comments we receive, we regret that we are unable to respond directly to each one. We invite you to email your question to [email protected], where it will be considered for a future response by one of our expert columnists. For personal advice, we suggest consulting with a qualified advisor.