Still beating the market after 9 years
Last year's top picks returned 55%!
Advertisement
Last year's top picks returned 55%!
As you might imagine, we’re very pleased with our performance record. Just take a look at the charts above, which translate the percentages into more easily understandable dollar terms. If you had split $100,000 equally among the original All-Stars nine years ago, then sold them and moved your gains into the new stocks each year, your portfolio would now be worth approximately $481,000—almost five times your original investment. Again, that doesn’t include dividends, but they could have been used to buy more than a few presents over the years. We’ll be toasting our success this holiday season, but remember stock-picking comes with more than a dash of risk and uncertainty. Our picks underperformed the market twice in the last nine years and we fully expect to encounter difficult periods in the future. Also, some stocks that may look good today could go on to perform poorly. We hope to avoid such situations but we’re not always that lucky. That’s why it’s important to know what you’re getting into before diving into the stock market. Those starting out should read The MoneySense Guide to Investing in Stocks. It explains the basics of stock-picking and more advanced topics. Still, we hope our track record whets your appetite for this year’s Top 200. As in prior years, we scrutinize our 200 largest public companies and grade each on its investment merit.The Top 200 provides a logical, consistent, and easy-to-use approach to uncovering the best stocks. Like the penny-pinching Ebenezer Scrooge, our method isn’t swayed by feelings or fancies. Nor do we rely on gut instincts or exuberant expectations of what the future might bring. Instead, we focus on the numbers and our opinions about each company don’t enter into it. We begin with the largest 200 companies in Canada, based on revenues, using data from Bloomberg. We then grade each stock for its investment appeal based on two measures. First we size up its merit as a value investment, then its attractiveness as a growth investment. (Value investors like to buy lots of assets for low prices while growth investors prefer firms with good sales and earnings growth.) Our tests use a set of complex calculations, but in the end we reduce everything about a stock to two simple grades: one for its growth potential and one for its value appeal. The grades work like they did when you were in school. Top stocks are awarded As. Solid firms get by with Bs or Cs. Those that don’t quite measure up are sent home with a D or an F. We are attracted to stocks with good grades while those at the bottom should prompt serious second thoughts. To get into the All-Star list, a stock must achieve at least one A and one B on the value and growth tests. Only 11 made it into this elite group this year.Investors who put money into our All-Stars when we started nine years ago have enjoyed stellar returns, easily outpacing the S&P/TSX Composite Index. If you had split $100,000 equally among our original All-Stars, then sold each year’s picks to invest in the new picks, your portfolio would have almost quintupled in value to $481, 000 in nine years—and that’s not including dividends.
Share this article Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Share on Reddit Share on Email