Advertisement
Whole life is like a GIC with free life insurance if held long enough
Q. My wife and I have had a 20-year pay life insurance plan with London Life for several years. The plan has been paid for by dividends after 20 years of premiums. We are both 60 years old now, with two adult children ages 24 and 27, and both have their own careers. The plans are both worth $60,000 each as life insurance and they both have a cash value of $30,000 each.
Would it be better to take out the cash portion and invest it—or to leave the plans as is? We both have pretty much maxed out our RRSP and TFSA plans. My wife is retiring this year, and I am still working, double dipping from a previous 25-year career.
– Thank you sincerely, Neil
A. Neil, I have to tell you, I have a whole life policy myself, and for me, it’s about knowing that if my wife and I screw up, my kids will at least get the value of my life insurance.
READ: How to minimize taxes with whole life insuranceIf your goal is to make as much money as possible then surrendering the policy and taking the cash is probably the way to go, but is that your goal? You’ve maxed your RRSPs and TFSAs, and my guess is you’re well prepared for retirement. Heck, you probably don’t need the insurance benefit because of several factors: you have lots of money, you’ll likely spend most of your RRIF in retirement so there won’t be much tax on the estate, and you’re maximizing your TFSAs and they’ll pass tax-free to your kids. Why keep the insurance? First, here’s a quick overview of some of the details of whole life insurances:
READ: Should I buy life insurance for my child?So why wouldn’t everyone buy a whole life policy? The cost. A 30-year-old female can purchase a $500,000 10-year term policy for about $19/month and a whole life policy for $250/month. A male would pay $25/month and $300/month, respectively. When you’re young, with children and debts, the total death benefit is more important than the bells and whistles. My simple definition of a whole life policy is a GIC with free life insurance if you hold it long enough—roughly 15 years or more. So how you can use this policy now? Consider the policy as part of the cash or bond holdings in your investment portfolio so you can have a larger tilt toward equities and possibly earn a higher return.
READ: How to choose the right insuranceAs you get older use the insurance to protect your estate against a market drop. A drop of $120,000 will be covered by the insurance. Manulife has a program where you can borrow against your whole life policy and invest. If you decide to surrender the policy, confirm the taxable amount of the cash value. I’m guessing about 50% will be taxable, meaning you’ll both need to add $15,000 to your taxable income. You can offset that with a $15,000 RRSP contribution if you have the room. I’ve assumed this policy has a paid-up-additions (PUA) dividend option. If the dividend option is dividends on deposit, then you don’t have to surrender the policy to get the cash value. You’ll be paying tax on the dividend growth each year and in this case, it may make sense to withdraw the dividends and invest elsewhere. Insurance can be a funny product. On paper, you can construct a financial plan that will beat it almost every time. In real life, stuff happens and you never know how, or when, you’ll use the policy. It is an older policy so the premiums are relatively low. If the premiums aren’t a big deal, I’d keep the insurance. Allan Norman, M.Sc., CFP, CIM, Atlantis Financial/IPC Investment Corp.
Share this article Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Share on Reddit Share on Email
Would swapping a house for cash from a corporation save on taxes? And is this tactic worth it in...
It’s a first among bank-owned discount brokers in Canada. With more banks likely to follow RBC's lead, what should...
Allison resold her Eras Tour tickets instead of going to the concert. The resale website asked for her SIN,...
Contrary to the conventional advice, taking more than the minimum RRIF withdrawal can at times save tax on your...
If you continue working in retirement, it could cause a clawback on your OAS. Here’s how to figure out...
Canadians with no children or siblings must consider estate planning alternatives. Here’s why trust companies can be a good...
The federal government’s capital gains inclusion rate increase has yet to become law. There’s a slight chance it may...
Canadians have reporting requirements for foreign assets, income and tax paid. Here’s how to claim each of these on...
A Certified Financial Planner provides perspective on the TFSA vs. RRSP question for a couple in their late 50s...
In retirement, some income is not subject to withholding tax, and you may potentially owe tax after filing each...
I read your analysis on the article: Should we cash in our whole life policies and invest? (from 2018), and my question is on the sentence: Although there’s a death benefit and a cash value (which you can borrow from or against), you only get one or the other. You don’t get both. 1. does this mean that, if I die, my beneficiary can CHOSE BETWEEN the face value coverage of the insurance OR the amount accumulated in the CASH VALUE?. 2. Please, True or False: If I die and the coverage is paid to my beneficiary, the CASH VALUE accumulated becomes worthless and is lost.
Due to the large volume of comments we receive, we regret that we are unable to respond directly to each one. We invite you to email your question to [email protected], where it will be considered for a future response by one of our expert columnists. For personal advice, we suggest consulting with your financial institution or a qualified advisor.