Looking for income
Bruce Sellery weighs the pros and cons of generating income from a rental property versus a conventional portfolio.
Advertisement
Bruce Sellery weighs the pros and cons of generating income from a rental property versus a conventional portfolio.
Question:
I am 47 years old, female, single, and have no children. My principal residence is paid for, I have no debt, and I have $200,000 that I would like to use to create some form of regular retirement income. I am thinking about buying a second house and renting it out, but I wonder if I would be better off investing the money in the markets. I have been self-employed my whole life and therefore have no pension to rely on. CPP will provide very little, and with the changes to the OAS coupled with some personal health problems, which may force me into retirement sooner than I’d like, I’m concerned about my future.
Answer
In a previous post (see Living off the rent) I reviewed some of the questions you should ask yourself before you pursue a strategy of using a rental property to provide income in retirement. But you shouldn’t stop there. In order to compare that strategy with a more conventional approach—investing in stocks, bonds, mutual funds and exchange traded funds—you have to consider what your portfolio might look like. It might really help for you to bring a financial adviser into the discussion here. If you don’t already have one, discuss these issues with a few different advisers and see what they have to say.
Review a model portfolio: While it is impossible to accurately predict what a $200,000 portfolio will do in the future, you can make some conservative assumptions based on the past. Your adviser will be able to show you how long your portfolio will last based on:
Share this article Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Share on Reddit Share on Email