Budget 2022: How it may affect Canadians’ finances and investments
The budget includes a new program for first-time home buyers, bank taxes, dental coverage and more. What does it mean for you?
Advertisement
The budget includes a new program for first-time home buyers, bank taxes, dental coverage and more. What does it mean for you?
The 2022 federal budget isn’t as bad as many had feared it would be. Announced on April 7 by finance minister Chrystia Freeland, it’s called “A Plan to Grow Our Economy and Make Life More Affordable,” and it focuses on housing, dental care, defence and more.
Pandemics can be expensive, especially for taxpayers. It may be too soon to say how it will all play out, but investors and high-income taxpayers were anticipating worse. There are some good things for a few of us, including those looking to buy a home for the first time. What does it all mean for you, your money and your investments?
The deficit is top of mind. The Canadian Taxpayers Federation called the 2022 budget a “credit card budget” for its strategy of borrowing and spending. The deficit is expected to be $52.8 billion this year. The federal government’s spending is projected to be $452.3 billion in 2022, which is $89.4 billion above pre-pandemic spending in 2019.
The national debt is projected to grow to $1.2 trillion by the end of the fiscal year. Budget 2022 is adding another $148 billion to the debt by 2027. Interest on the debt is projected to cost taxpayers $26.9 billion this year. Budget 2022 does not include a plan to balance the books.
Read on for more about the budget numbers and how they may affect you.
Budget 2022 gives first-time home buyers a little help. It introduced the tax-free first home savings account (FHSA), a new type of registered account for home buyers to grow their down payment and avoid raiding their registered retirement savings plans (RRSPs). That said, Canadians can transfer up to $8,000 annually from their RRSP to an FHSA. Note, however, that they can’t use both an FHSA and the existing Home Buyers’ Plan, which allows for RRSP withdrawals up to $35,000 (or $70,000 per couple) and payback over 15 years.
The FHSA will be available in 2023, and home buyers can contribute up to $40,000. Account holders will get RRSP-style tax rebates when they contribute, and their money will be able to grow tax-free and be withdrawn tax-free. Unlike with an RRSP, though, if account holders miss a year of contributions, they can’t carry forward the contribution room. FHSA accounts can stay open for 15 years; if the account holder doesn’t buy a home, they can transfer the funds into an RRSP or a registered retirement income fund (RRIF).
Budget 2022 also allocates $10 billion to address the housing crisis:
The $4 billion allocated to municipalities is a pledge to move ahead with the Housing Accelerator Fund, which is designed to incentivize housing construction by cutting red tape related to municipal planning, zoning and permitting systems.
The budget also includes:
Canada is taking the first steps towards universal dental coverage. The government will launch a new dental program in 2022, starting with children under age 12, at an initial cost of $300 million. The dental program is a major plank of the Liberals’ confidence-and-supply agreement with the NDP to keep the government in power until 2025.
The new dental program will be restricted to families with an income of less than $90,000, with no copays for those who make under $70,000 per year. In 2023, eligibility will expand to include children under 18, seniors and persons with disabilities. The government expects full implementation by 2025. The cost will be $5.3 billion over five years.
The budget was light on any other healthcare spending or policy announcements. The Liberals committed to passing a legislative framework for a national pharmacare plan by the end of 2023 as part of their deal with the NDP.
For lower- to middle-income retirees, the dental and pharmacare programs will remove some financial burdens. The programs will also benefit lower- and middle-income families, potentially freeing up funds for other expenses or investments.
Some argue that taxing banks more could affect loans and the buck could be passed along to bank clients through fees. We will have to wait and see. A planned tax (applied to banks and insurance companies) was altered from an initial proposal outlined in the Liberal Party’s 2021 election platform. In place of a three-percentage-point surtax on financial institutions’ earnings over $1 billion, the budget includes a 1.5-percentage-point increase on taxable income over $100 million. That brings the tax rate on those earnings from 15% to 16.5%.
The budget also includes the Canada Recovery Dividend: a one-time 15% tax on financial institutions’ taxable income above $1 billion for the 2021 tax year, payable over five years. The two budgeted tax hikes are projected to bring in a little over $6 billion, down from the roughly $11 billion estimated in the Liberal platform.
The banks and other financial institutions are in a very strong position. These companies benefited greatly from Canadians’ increased savings during the pandemic). In their current state, they should be able to easily absorb these additional taxes, but there may be modest pressure on the potential of future dividend increases.
Under our NATO obligations, Canada should be spending 2% of its GDP on defence. Last year, it spent 1.36%. To meet its NATO obligation, the government would have to set aside $20 to $25 billion per year, according to the Parliamentary Budget Officer. Budget 2022 has allocated $8 billion, to be spread over many years, and there is no plan to meet our NATO spending obligations.
If Canada does eventually spend 2% of its GDP on defence, significant tax revenues would be required. That could include an increase in personal income tax rates or even HST.
Canada is in line with the global trend of supporting electric vehicles and clean energy development, which should raise the eyebrows of Canadian investors. Sustainable companies were a common investment theme in my Making Sense of the Markets columns. There are opportunities to take advantage of these powerful long-term trends. I continue to add to my green energy supercycle ETF (GMET), plus uranium (HURA) and lithium (HLIT), and the EV ecosystem (BATT).
Budget 2022 proposes to establish the Canada Growth Fund to attract private-sector investment. The fund will be initially capitalized at $15 billion over the next five years, and it will target $3 of private capital for every $1 invested.
Fortunately, the capital gains tax inclusion rate remains at 50%, and we still have the principal residence exemption, meaning you don’t have to pay tax on the capital gain realized from selling the property where you live. Federal personal income tax rates remain unchanged. Matt Poyner wrote about the budget from the perspective of the self-directed investor for his site dividendstrategy.ca.
That said, high-income earners have been put on notice. They might soon have to pay their “fair share” of income taxes.
A major risk to taxpayers and investors is slow growth in Canada, which would put a lid on tax revenues. Inflation and the rising-rate environment might greatly increase our debt servicing costs. Critics suggest that the budget could stoke even more inflation.
Also, recessions are a normal part of the economic cycle. A recession would put incredible strain on government revenues. In the recession caused by the financial crisis (2008–09), revenues fell by 35%. The drop was greater in the brief COVID-related recession.
Annual government revenues in millions:
So much has to go right for the debt and deficit projections to play out as planned. If there are growing budget shortfalls, the feds may be forced to look for increased tax revenues beyond the special bank taxes.
You can bet that government agencies will follow or chase the money from individuals and profitable sectors. When Willie Sutton was asked why he robs banks, he replied, “Because that’s where the money is.”
Dale Roberts is a MoneySense contributor. He is a proponent of low-fee investing, and he blogs at cutthecrapinvesting.com. Find him on Twitter @67Dodge for market updates and commentary, every morning.
Share this article Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Share on Reddit Share on Email
Well, one of the largest segments of the population, Retiree’s and Pensioners ie: Baby Boomers are being totally left out of Government planning and have been for years. This will become an even bigger problem for the government over a short period of time as a lot of the boomers are living a lot longer than anticipated by anyone and most never had enough investments or pensions to sustain themselves long term. Most of them are broke, living month to month on a meagre pension that has never kept up with inflation. They can’t even sell their homes and move down to create cash flow because the entire real estate market is out of balance and won’t allow them to do so. I don’t think the government is being totally honest about how they sell the Cost Of Living and Inflation numbers. Housing has got up over 100% in the last 10-years. Gasoline over 100% in just 5-years. Food, clothing, heat and light, telephone, daycare etc. etc. etc. The list goes on. Have peoples wages gone up to reflect these rising costs, no they have not. And even worse for pensioners is the cost to maintain their homes, things like maintenance upkeep not even to mention home ” TAXES ” that are eating up most of the pensioners annual income. Yes, they let us for go paying taxes on our homes until we sell, thats only to prevent most seniors in that position from being forced out on to the streets. Start looking after the largest voting group or we will look after you at election time. What $350 during Covid, Wow! that was sure a big help wasn’t it. Most people are hurting in Canada but the seniors are hurting the most. They won’t even go out for a Sunday drive because of rising gasoline costs. and furthermore most of the younger population don’t care or realize what’s happening to them because they are caught up with their own problems ie: housing , daycare etc. “HELP THE SENIORS” now! Thanks for listening. Gary M. Vancouver, B.C.
The government revenue chart is off a few decimal places. Should be in millions, not billions.
Thank you for letting us know. We regret the error and have updated the article. We do our best to fact check all our content before it gets published, but some things do get missed.
Not one word about reducing the burgeoning number of federal civil servants, their CPI adjusted salaries, generous benefits, and indexed defined benefit pensions. Billions per year could saved, if this was ever addressed in a serious manner – or at all. Perennial deficits in the tens of billions is not sustainable. And the answer is NOT to squeeze more taxes from the middle class. Reduce the size of government!
Wife and I went to school saved, bought our first home. Worked (working) multiple jobs, raising a family. Saving for post secondary. Acquired work with benefits, saving for retirement.
Is there anything in this budget (or the past few for that matter) that provide relief for the working middle class. Cost of living, taxes, interest rates, low income subsidies and benefits increase. Tax deductions, monthly expendable income decreases. Support increasing minimum wages, and basic health care/dental and encouraging savings incentives for first time home buyers $10/day daycare Ontario, increased military spending (served for 20+ years)… However not keen on astronomical debt and zero incentives for the working middle class.
Nice and clear writing Dale, keep it up that way !
This government needs to stop giving away money. Who needs government paid dental care that makes $60K to $90K a year?? They need to hire an OUTSIDE company to do internal audits/work unit investigations to clearly see that they need to reduce staff in many areas to save taxpayers money.
17/04/24
Hmmm. Let me wonder. I wonder if wealthy Canadians will take their money out of our stock market. Perhaps even leave Canada altogether.
I wonder if this is just the beginning and capital gains for ordinary folk will see a similar increase when the government gets more concerned about trying to feed the horrible deficit, not to mention the debt.
I wonder why our MPs don’t represent those who elect them better, by insisting on reducing the huge grants dolled out at the whim of the Liberal party. Have any of them ever asked the voters what they prefer to fund?
I wonder why Canadians have made little effort to protest any government hurling wads of cash at many issues which most Canadians don’t wish to support.
On another topic, at my age, I am deeply dismayed to see young people unable to get decent jobs. My grandson, a university student, was unable to find summer work last year, despite having sent out applications or personally present his resume. We are not supporting youth employment enough. It is a great shame, since they represent the future of our country.