Are Rebel Media films right for Canadian retirement plans?
Whatever your ideology, always consider the risks
Advertisement
Whatever your ideology, always consider the risks
You will find lots of information at MoneySense.ca on how to build a low-fee, diversified ETF portfolio. Our endorsed Couch Potato strategy involves keeping your holdings simple and leaving them alone to build your wealth. But since this fund is being marketed to Canadians as a retirement investment, we thought we’d take a closer look. The plan is launch it March 1, and more disclosure is pending. The Rebel Freedom Fund was born out of a discussion between Dale Wells, a self-described conservative and Levant fan, and the Rebel founder. Wells had donated money to Rebel crowdfunding projects in the past and told MoneySense in an interview he shares many of the same views as Levant. The two got to know each other over the years and when Wells brought up the idea of a fund that could help Levant develop more projects, and tap into the Rebel’s rabid fan base, Levant liked what he heard. “I think there’s a good market out there,” says Wells, who says that Levant has nothing to do with the running of the fund itself. “I felt that if we set something like this it up that it would help the Rebel cause and the conservative cause.”Related: A guide to having retirement income for life
Wells, who was disciplined in 2010 by the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada for acting in the role of an advisor without being registered as one, considers his firm a private debt lender. His Wells Multi Strategy Fund invests in asset-backed debt obligations, including in the entertainment and residential mortgage space. He often invests in movies, he says, including the 2016 Denzel Washington film Fences and the Charlize Theron film Tully, which comes out in April. The primary focus of the Rebel Freedom Fund will be to invest in Rebel-related projects, such as movies or documentaries. Through his other fund he has already invested in one of Levant’s films: Save The Christians, a documentary The Rebel’s website says is about “Christian genocide in Iraq.” However, Wells says that the fund may also invest in other right-learning films or projects and other “third-party investments” like a mortgage backed securities fund or another private debt-related vehicle. (He does say he would invest in left-leaning projects, too, but they wouldn’t find their way into the Rebel Freedom Fund.) Wells says the Rebel fund is a legitimate portfolio and he’ll only invest in projects if he thinks Levant’s company will be able to pay quarterly interest on the money that the fund loans out. He’ll make that determination by regularly looking at the company’s books. If The Rebel doesn’t have enough cash flow to make its payments, then Wells says he won’t invest in its projects and could even pull the plug on the partnership. He does say the company has no cash flow issues as of now. And about that 4% return: Wells says that the company must generate about 9% to cover its costs and hit that return target. There’s a 2.5% management expense ratio, a 2% licensing fee that needs to be paid to The Rebel for the use of its name, and another .5% of additional costs on top of that. Many ETFs and index funds having an established record of generating equal or better returns for as low as 0.08%, you really have to believe in The Rebel to pay those kinds of fees.Opinion: Rebel Media —or dog toys? Pick your investment
Funds like these are much less liquid than a traditional mutual fund and, according to Wells’ website, investors will only be able to pull their money out of the fund once a month. It’s also much harder to know what exactly is happening within the fund – investing in a Rebel documentary is not the same thing as investing in BCE stock. If enough projects go bust and if the Rebel can’t pay Wells interest on its investment, it would prove difficult to get that “targeted” 4% return. Then there’s the no small matter of Levant’s track record as a provocateur and Wells’ history with the IIROC. “We’re always leery of mangers with bad regulatory track records,” says Christopher Davis, an equity analyst with Morningstar. (Wells said he had to pay about $10,000 in fines and disagrees with the ruling, but he “respects the decision and it’s made me who I am today.”) Davis also says that it’s never a good idea to make investment decisions based on political ideology. “It’s always a mistake,” he says. “It’s hard to be objective when it’s furthering a political aim – whether right or left leaning.” Wells is aware that Levant himself could impact the prospects of the fund. “if Ezra says something inappropriate on any given day then (The Rebel’s) cash flow could change in five minutes,” he says. And while the website does say it’s for people saving for retirement, he adds that investors shouldn’t put all their money into a fund like this. “It’s by no means right for everyone,” says Wells. He classifies it as a medium-risk investment, though Davis, who hasn’t analyzed the fund in depth, says he suspects it will be likely prove to be much higher risk than that.Related: How ETF investors sabotage themselves
Share this article Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Share on Reddit Share on Email